Read the following passage carefully
At birth, says Ibn Khaldun, we are entirely devoid of knowledge; we are still no more than ‘raw material'. We then gradually gain ‘form' ‘thanks to the knowledge we acquire through our organs'. Essentially ignorant, we fulfill ourselves as human beings only through knowledge. Ibn Khaldun distinguishes three types of knowledge corresponding to as many ‘degrees of thought'. There is practical knowledge, the product of ‘the discerning intelligence', which allows us to act in the world in a controlled fashion; then ‘a knowledge of what we must or must not do and of what is good or evil', which we acquire through our ‘empirical intelligence' and which guides us in our relations with our fellows; and, lastly, theoretical knowledge of everything that exists in the world, which we conquer by our ‘speculative intelligence'. Only this last type of knowledge, the subject of the sciences, gives us the possibility of reaching perfection of soul.
The teaching of the sciences is necessary for two reasons: firstly, thorough knowledge of them requires a lengthy period of learning that can be carried out only with the help of teachers; secondly, their very development requires them to be communicated to others.
Ibn Khaldun's pedagogical conception is based on the central concept of the habitus, in connection with the learning of the arts. All habitus are necessarily corporal. He understands the habitus as something the soul can acquire only through the senses, as opposed to another type of knowledge proper to the prophets and mystics, which can be obtained only through the contemplation by the soul of its own essence.
This concerns both the physical and the intellectual aptitudes, starting with the very fact of thinking. The formation of a habitus initially requires continuous repetition until the form is fixed. In order to obtain maximum efficiency, it must be a practice (bi-'l-mubashara) and modeled on the most perfect exemplars with the help of the best teachers, preferably following methods of direct observation (bi-'l-mu'ayana). Ibn Khaldun thinks that the soul has but fairly limited receptivity (isti'dad). For one thing, it cannot receive several ‘dyes' at a time; then, when it has taken on one of these, its capacity to receive others gradually diminishes. Training must thus start from the earliest age, when the soul is still virgin, ‘because the first things to be imprinted into hearts are like foundations for the habitus; and the building's value is determined by that of its foundations'.
Ibn Khaldun calls attention to another important factor in the formation of habitus, namely that of authority. An overly severe attitude on the part of the teacher leads to the most harmful consequences, particularly for young children. In this connection, he cites the situation of slaves, servants and oppressed nations. Constraint and oppression break the character, sap energy and in the end destroy their subjects' capacity for realizing ‘their destiny and their full humanity'. He therefore recommends moderate use of authority and punishment, taking into consideration the personality of the pupil and the need ‘to instruct without afflicting the pupil and killing his or her spirit'.
Finally, habitus can be either good or bad; they may take the form of either virtue or vice, good or evil, good taste or bad, refinement or crudeness, clarity and exactness or confusion. They also differ in degree, depending on the quality of teaching and of the models imitated and on the general level of development of the civilization.
Source: Ibnu Khaldun
Post your writing
Deterioration of morals, ethics, and decrease of nation achievement is a strong indication that this nation is facing various dilemmas. If it does not have any solution that can be found we will face more complicated problems. Character and culture education is considered as one solution to minimize shallow understanding against the noble values of the Indonesian nation. How can Ibnu khaldun’s pedagogical principles be integrated into Indonesian Schools to provide perfect human beings (insan kamil)?